For hackathon organizers
Reviewers stall around row 200 and half the ideas say “something with AI”. FormzoAI asks each applicant one follow-up, then scores the whole pile on your judging criteria with the reason beside each score.
Hackathon applications
Their chat
What do you want to build at Spring Hack?
What you get
86/ 100
Scored on your criteria
A real user, data they already keep, and a demo that fits in 36 hours.
You still make the call.
Example answers, written for this page.
Row 214 of the review sheet
Five volunteers share one Google Sheet. The scores in column F stop halfway down, applications closed Sunday, and acceptances go out Friday.
“Something with AI”
Half the answers to “what do you want to build” say exactly that. A first-timer with a real idea looks the same as someone who filled the box in ten seconds.
Every reviewer has their own scale
One gives everyone a 4, another never goes above 2. The selection meeting turns into an argument about the scale instead of the applicants.
Describe your hackathon in one sentence
“Applications for a 36-hour student hackathon, 300 spots, teams of up to four.” FormzoAI drafts the questions, team ones included, and you edit anything.
Hackers apply in a short chat
One question at a time on their phone, answered in their own language. When someone writes “something with AI”, the chat asks once who it's for.
Write your rubric, get a ranked list
Give it the criteria you'd give your reviewers, like a clear user or first-timers welcome, and weight them. Every application is scored once, with the reason beside it.
Every application gets one score on the rubric you wrote, with the sentence that earned it, so all your reviewers start from the same reading. Open any summary to check it, then export your picks to Google Sheets or CSV. You and your team decide who gets in.
Spring Hack 2027 · applications
0 in
Free to join. Spots open in batches.